Nursing Theory, Postmodernism, Post-structuralism, and Foucault
Olga Petrovskaya
About this book
Nursing Theory, Postmodernism, Post-structuralism, and Foucault critiques mainstream American nursing theory and its use of post-structural theory, comparing and contrasting how postmodern and post-structural ideas have been used fruitfully in nursing research and theorizing elsewhere.
In the late 1980s, references to post-structuralism and Michel Foucault started to appear in nursing journals. Since then, hundreds of nursing publications have cited postmodernism and key post-structural ideas such as power/knowledge, discourse, and de-centring the human subject. In Nursing Theory, Postmodernism, Post-structuralism, and Foucault, Olga Petrovskaya argues that the application of these ideas is markedly different in American nursing theory scholarship compared to nursing theoretical scholarship generated outside the canon of “unique” nursing theory. Analysing relevant literature from the late 1980s through 2010s, she demonstrates this difference, arguing that American nursing theory calcified into a matrix of dogmas built on logical positivism, wary of “borrowed” theory, and loyal to a “unique nursing science.” Post-structural ideas that fit the matrix, such as criticism of medicine, are sanctioned, whereas ideas sceptical of humanistic agendas including those that challenge American nursing theory are rendered meaningless. In contrast, other nurse scholars from Britain, Australia, Canada, and what the author calls the American enclave group engaged with postmodern and post-structural perspectives to enrich their research and invite readers to rethink nursing practice. The book showcases examples of their intelligent, creative theorizing. Arguing that American nursing theory enervated nursing theorizing, Petrovskaya calls for opening this matrix to theoretical and methodological creativity, less rigid categories of scholarship, and healthy self-examination.
Making the case that post-structural ideas are vital for nurses’ ability to critically reflect on their discipline and profession, this is a necessary read for all those interested in nursing theory, philosophy, and praxis.
Questions & Answers from this book
Questions and answers are connected to the referenced book and its available source material.
Chapter 1: Early 21st-Century Canadian Nursing at a Theoretical Crossroads: Between American Nursing Theory and British-Australian Post-structural Theorizing
Which theorists are commonly cited alongside Foucault in nursing publications, and what does this indicate about the reception of postmodern and post-structural theory in nursing?
Nursing publications commonly cite Foucault alongside Goffman, Kristeva, Haraway, J. Butler, Latour, Derrida, Barthes, Lyotard, and Rorty. This indicates that nursing scholars usually accept blurred boundaries between postmodernism and post-structuralism, treating the terms as nearly interchangeable, and that they focus on how these ideas depart from and challenge earlier Western thought and practices.
According to the text, why do nursing authors often blur the boundaries between postmodernism and post-structuralism?
Nursing authors often blur postmodernism and post-structuralism because the overlap between the two movements is evident and the shared focus is on how these 'post'(s) depart from and challenge earlier Western ideas and practices. Distinctions between the two rarely enter nursing literature, since nurses commonly draw on a mix of 'postmodern' writers, with Foucault chief among them, so the terms are often used nearly interchangeably.
Chapter 2: Establishing the Field of Study: Postmodern, Post-structural, and Foucauldian Nursing Scholarship
How does the chapter characterize the conception of nursing philosophy in influential American theoretical nursing literature, and how does this conception shape attitudes towards continental philosophy?
Influential American theoretical nursing literature conceives of nursing theory/philosophy as a values manifesto that depicts what nursing should be: an ideal and aspirational vision rather than an empirical description of what is. This preference for futuristic, hope-imbued theory shapes attitudes by favoring continental philosophies that provide normative or ethical guidance, while treating postmodern and post-structural theory, such as Foucault's work, with suspicion because of its moral ambiguity and poor fit with nursing's values.
According to the chapter, what were the concerns of nurse leaders in the early 1950s that led to the call for a philosophy of nursing?
Nurse leaders in the early 1950s were concerned that clinical nurses were moving away from direct patient care into managerial roles and that technologies were increasingly interfering with care. They were especially troubled that these changes resulted from social factors beyond nurses' reflective, intentional action. This prompted the call for a philosophy of nursing to define nursing, clarify what its practice should be, and defend the proper role of nurses.
Chapter 3: American Nursing Science and Discipline-Specific Theory: In the Grips of Logical Positivism
What paradox arises when embracing post-structural thought in nursing, according to the text?
The paradox is that embracing post-structural thought forces nurses to think critically, yet the outcome of that thinking is not predetermined and may prove 'dangerous,' unraveling nurses' cherished ideologies rather than confirming them.
Why is late Frankfurt critical theory, such as Habermas's, more popular in nursing than other strands of continental theory?
Late Frankfurt critical theory, such as Habermas's, is more popular in nursing because it is normative and prescriptive, offering clear moral direction like empowerment and emancipation. By contrast, other strands of continental theory are neither normative nor prescriptive; they tend to describe what is without reassuring readers about a preferred future and often advocate theoretical anti-humanism.
Chapter 4: Postmodern and Post-structural Ideas in American Nursing Texts I: Gortner, Dzurec, Reed, Watson, and Nursing Science Quarterly
What were the two observations made by the author in 2008 and 2012 that prompted the exploration of nursing postmodern/post-structural scholarship?
In 2008, the author observed Sioban Nelson, editor of Nursing Inquiry, noting nurse academics' rising interest in Foucault's ideas while urging a shift from quantity to quality in scholarship citing Foucault. In 2012, the author observed Afaf Meleis asserting that postmodernism and post-structuralism were not useful to nursing, claiming postmodernism was irrelevant in medical sociology and that similar assumptions could be made about its utility for nursing science.
According to the chapter, what was the time frame of the book's analysis and why was this period chosen?
The book analyzes the first two decades of postmodern, post-structural, and Foucauldian nursing scholarship, roughly from the late 1980s through the early 2010s. The author chose this period to convey the contrast between different streams in the literature, because it includes the 2005–2009 heyday of such scholarship, and because two observations from 2008 and 2012 pointed to important developments spanning the 1990s to the early 2010s.
Chapter 5: Postmodern and Post-Structural Ideas in American Nursing Texts II: Advances in Nursing Science and the Enclave Group
According to the chapter, which three non-American nursing journals led in publishing post-structural scholarship, and what was the approximate percentage of American authors in these journals?
The three non-American nursing journals were the Journal of Advanced Nursing (JAN), Nursing Inquiry, and Nursing Philosophy. Only about 10% of post-structural papers in these journals were by American authors (17 of 199 papers).
How did the number of post-structural papers in Advances in Nursing Science (ANS) change from the period 2000–2004 to 2005–2009, and what happened during 2010–2015?
From 2000 to 2004, Advances in Nursing Science published 13 paper(s) mentioning post-structuralism. From 2005 to 2009 this number dropped markedly to 2. During 2010–2015, no papers mentioning post-structuralism appeared in ANS.
You may also be interested in
Anatomy Physiology by Elaine N. Marieb, Katja N. Hoehn
Elaine N. Marieb and Katja Hoehn
60 questions
Middle Range Theory for Nursing
Mary Jane Smith, PhD, RN, FAAN,Patricia R. Liehr, PhD, RN
40 questions
Oxford Handbook of Adult Nursing, Third Edition
Unknown
37 questions
Fundamentals of Pharmacology: An Applied Approach for Nursing and Health
Alan Galbraith ... [et Al.].
36 questions